Heavy Equipment Is Not an Asset It’s a Cost Center

Availability Is Not Utilization

One of the most common misconceptions in mining operations is equating availability with productivity.

Availability measures whether equipment is mechanically ready to operate. Utilization measures whether it is actually producing value.

A haul truck can be:

• Available but idle
• Running but underloaded
• Operating on short haul distances with poor economics
  

From a financial perspective, availability without utilization is meaningless. Depreciation, financing costs, insurance, and maintenance continue regardless of whether the equipment is productive.

Contractors that focus on availability alone often overstate fleet performance while underestimating cost per BCM.

Also Read: Broom.id: Transforming Financial Operations with NetSuite

Maintenance Planning: From Preventive to Reactive

Maintenance is often discussed as a technical discipline. In reality, it is an economic one.
Well-planned preventive maintenance reduces total lifecycle cost by:

• Avoiding catastrophic failures
• Extending component life
• Stabilizing maintenance spend
  

Poor maintenance planning shifts the operation into reactive mode:

• Breakdowns dictate schedules
• Spare parts are rushed at premium cost
• Downtime becomes unpredictable
  

Reactive maintenance rarely shows up immediately as a crisis. Instead, it manifests as:

• Gradual increases in maintenance cost per hour
• Rising equipment downtime
• Declining reliability across the fleet
  

Because these effects are distributed across time and equipment units, they are often normalized rather than addressed.

Tyres: The Blind Spot That Destroys Economics

In many mining operations, tyres are one of the largest operating expenses after fuel and maintenance. Yet tyre economics are frequently poorly understood.

Common issues include:

• Tyres treated as consumables rather than tracked components
• Limited visibility into tyre life by equipment unit
• Inconsistent pressure management and rotation discipline
• Replacement decisions driven by failure rather than economics
  

Tyre cost per hour or per BCM can vary dramatically across similar equipment. Without systematic tracking, these variances remain hidden.

When tyre performance is not analyzed at unit level, management cannot distinguish between:

• Operational misuse
• Maintenance discipline issues
• Supplier quality problems
  

The result is predictable: tyres become an uncontrollable cost.

From an accounting perspective, heavy equipment is recorded as a fixed asset, depreciated over time, and reported on the balance sheet. This is necessary, but insufficient for management.

Traditional asset accounting:

• Treats equipment as static
• Focuses on book value rather than economic performance
• Separates depreciation from operational behavior
  

As a result, management sees depreciation as an inevitable expense rather than a variable that can be optimized through utilization and maintenance discipline.

Also Read: Choosing The Right NetSuite Partner

Equipment as an Economic Unit

Disciplined mining contractors change the framing entirely. They treat each piece of equipment as an economic unit that must justify its existence through output.

This means asking different questions:

• What is the full lifecycle cost of this unit?
• How much value does it generate per operating hour?
• Is this unit diluting or improving fleet economics?
  

To answer these questions consistently, data must be integrated across operations, maintenance, and finance.

How NetSuite Enables Equipment Cost Discipline

NetSuite does not replace fleet management or maintenance execution systems. It provides the financial and analytical layer that connects equipment activity to economic outcomes.

Fixed Asset Management with Economic Context

NetSuite tracks equipment as fixed assets, but crucially links depreciation to:

• Equipment usage
• Projects or pits
• Operating periods
  

This allows management to see depreciation not as a static charge, but as a cost that must be recovered through productive use.

Maintenance Cost Tracking by Equipment Unit

Maintenance expenses, including labor, spare parts, and external services, can be assigned directly to individual equipment units.

This creates visibility into:

• Maintenance cost per operating hour
• Maintenance cost trends by unit
• Units approaching economic end-of-life
  

Management can distinguish between normal wear and economically unjustifiable cost escalation.

Tyre and Spare Parts Cost Attribution

Tyres and critical spare parts can be tracked as components linked to specific equipment units. Their cost and lifespan become measurable.

This enables:

• Cost per hour analysis for tyres
• Identification of abnormal consumption
• Data-driven replacement and supplier decisions
  

Blind spots disappear when components are treated as economic drivers rather than consumables.

Lifecycle Cost per Unit Analysis

By integrating depreciation, maintenance, fuel, and component costs, NetSuite enables true lifecycle cost analysis.

Management can see:

• Total cost of ownership per unit
• Cost per BCM or per operating hour
• Comparative performance across similar equipment
  

This supports informed decisions on:

• Rebuild versus replace
• Fleet right-sizing
• Capital allocation timing
  

Restoring Control Without Disrupting Operations

One of the key advantages of treating equipment as a cost center is behavioral clarity.

When supervisors and managers see:

• Which units destroy value
• How idle time translates into real cost
• Where maintenance discipline breaks down
  

Decisions improve naturally. Conversations shift from blame to economics. Operations and finance align around the same data.

Control improves not through additional bureaucracy, but through transparency.

Strategic Implications Beyond Cost Reduction

Proper equipment economics change how contractors compete.

Bids become more accurate because fleet costs are well understood. Contract renegotiations are supported by credible data. Capital investments are timed based on economic performance rather than age alone.

Most importantly, management regains confidence that one of the largest cost drivers in the business is under control.

Final Thoughts

Heavy equipment is essential to mining contractors, but it is not an asset in the strategic sense. It is a cost center that must earn its place every day.

Contractors that continue to manage fleets based on availability, book value, and intuition will remain vulnerable to silent margin erosion. Those that manage equipment as economic units, supported by integrated systems and disciplined processes, build durable competitive advantage.

By using platforms such as NetSuite to connect asset records, maintenance activity, and financial performance, mining contractors can move from reactive fleet management to proactive economic control.

Can we help you to advance your business?

Contact us to discover your options.